example_template_text;phrase_to_split_on_for_bias_prediction;phrase_to_put_mask;example_instruction_text;prompt_instruction_text
"Bob: %s\nAlice: %s\nImplicature: %s";"Alice: ";"Implicature: %s";"Bob asks Alice a question, and Alice responds with an implicature. This means that Alice’s response does not literally contain the answer to Bob’s question, but implies an answer. Assuming that Alice is a cooperative conversational partner, what is the implicated answer to the question? For example:\n\nBob: You invented fire?\nAlice: I told you that.\nImplicature: Alice says 'I told you that'. Alice’s response must be relevant to Bob’s question because Alice is a cooperative conversational partner. Alice must mean that she told Bob that she invented fire. Alice’s response to Bob’s question 'You invented fire?' is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nBob: That cake looks delicious. Aren't you going to have some with me?\nAlice: But that was a huge meal we just had.\nImplicature: Alice’s response must be relevant to Bob’s question because Alice is a cooperative conversational partner. Alice must mean that the meal they just had was so huge she is not hungry anymore, and this must be relevant to Bob’s question: 'Aren’t you going to have some with me?' Alice’s response to the question must therefore be no.\nAnswer: no\n\nBob: Could you perform well?\nAlice: Being bilingual would help put me ahead of the pack.\nImplicature: Alice says being bilingual would help put her ahead of the pack. Alice’s response must be relevant to Bob’s question because Alice is a cooperative conversational partner. Alice must be implying that she could perform well because she is bilingual. This means the response to Bob’s question is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nBob: Have you any news for me?\nAlice: I've made progress\nImplicature: Alice says she has made progress. Alice’s response must be relevant to Bob’s question because Alice is a cooperative conversational partner. If Alice would not have any news for Bob, Alice would not have said she would have made progress because that would be misleading. The answer to Bob’s question 'Have you any news for me?' must therefore be yes. \nAnswer: yes\n\nBob: You looked out for him?\nAlice: He looked out for me. He taught me.\nImplicature: Bob asks Alice 'You looked out for him?' and Alice’s response says that the person that is being referred to by 'him' here looked out for Alice. If Alice meant yes to Bob’s question, Alice would have said something like 'he also looked out for me'. Stating the response like this implies that the answer to Bob’s question is no.\nAnswer: no\n\nOnly output a 'yes' or 'no' as a final answer. Even if you're uncertain, choose either 'yes' or 'no'.";"Each following response to the question implies yes or no:"
"Esther asked "%s" and Juan responded "%s", which means %s";"responded ";"means %s";"Esther asks Juan a question, and Juan responds with an implicature. This means that Juan’s response does not literally contain the answer to Esther’s question, but implies an answer. Assuming that Juan is a cooperative conversational partner, what is the implicated answer to the question? For example:\n\nEsther asked ‘You invented fire?’ and Juan responded ‘I told you that.’, which means\nImplication: Juan says “I told you that”. Juan’s response must be relevant to Esther’s question because Juan is a cooperative conversational partner. Juan must mean that he told Esther that he invented fire. Juan’s response to Esther’s question “You invented fire?” is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nEsther asked ‘That cake looks delicious. Aren't you going to have some with me?’ and Juan responded ‘But that was a huge meal we just had.’, which means\nImplication: Juan’s response must be relevant to Esther’s question because Juan is a cooperative conversational partner. Juan must mean that the meal they just had was so huge he is not hungry anymore, and this must be relevant to Esther’s question: “Aren’t you going to have some with me?” Juan’s response to the question must therefore be no.\nAnswer: no\n\nEsther asked ‘Could you perform well?’ and Juan responded ‘Being bilingual would help put me ahead of the pack.’, which means\nImplication: Juan says being bilingual would help put him ahead of the pack. Juan’s response must be relevant to Esther’s question because Juan is a cooperative conversational partner. Juan must be implying that he could perform well because he is bilingual. This means the response to Esther’s question is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nEsther asked ‘Have you any news for me?’ and Juan responded ‘I've made progress’, which means\nImplication: Juan says he has made progress. Juan’s response must be relevant to Esther’s question because Juan is a cooperative conversational partner. If Juan would not have any news for Esther, Juan would not have said he would have made progress because that would be misleading. The answer to Esther’s question “Have you any news for me?” must therefore be yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nEsther asked ‘You looked out for him?’ and Juan responded ‘He looked out for me. He taught me.’, which means\nImplication: Esther asks Juan “You looked out for him?” and Juan’s response says that the person that is being referred to by “him” here looked out for Juan. If Juan meant yes to Esther’s question, Juan would have said something like “he also looked out for me”. Stating the response like this implies that the answer to Esther’s question is no.\nAnswer: no\n\nOnly output a 'yes' or 'no' as a final answer. Even if you're uncertain, choose either 'yes' or 'no'.";"The following are examples of the task:"
"Esther: %s\nJuan: %s\nMeaning: %s";"Juan: ";"Meaning: %s";"Esther asks Juan a question, and Juan responds with an implicature. This means that Juan’s response does not literally contain the answer to Esther’s question, but implies an answer. Assuming that Juan is a cooperative conversational partner, what is the implicated answer to the question? For example:\n\nEsther: You invented fire?\nJuan: I told you that.\nMeaning: Juan says 'I told you that'. Juan’s response must be relevant to Esther’s question because Juan is a cooperative conversational partner. Juan must mean that he told Esther that he invented fire. Juan’s response to Esther’s question 'You invented fire?' is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nEsther: That cake looks delicious. Aren't you going to have some with me?\nJuan: But that was a huge meal we just had.\nMeaning: Juan’s response must be relevant to Esther’s question because Juan is a cooperative conversational partner. Juan must mean that the meal they just had was so huge he is not hungry anymore, and this must be relevant to Esther’s question: 'Aren’t you going to have some with me?' Juan’s response to the question must therefore be no.\nAnswer: no\n\nEsther: Could you perform well?\nJuan: Being bilingual would help put me ahead of the pack.\nMeaning: Juan says being bilingual would help put him ahead of the pack. Juan’s response must be relevant to Esther’s question because Juan is a cooperative conversational partner. Juan must be implying that he could perform well because he is bilingual. This means the response to Esther’s question is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nEsther: Have you any news for me?\nJuan: I've made progress\nMeaning: Juan says he has made progress. Juan’s response must be relevant to Esther’s question because Juan is a cooperative conversational partner. If Juan would not have any news for Esther, Juan would not have said he would have made progress because that would be misleading. The answer to Esther’s question 'Have you any news for me?' must therefore be yes. \nAnswer: yes\n\nEsther: You looked out for him?\nJuan: He looked out for me. He taught me.\nMeaning: Esther asks Juan 'You looked out for him?' and Juan’s response says that the person that is being referred to by 'him' here looked out for Juan. If Juan meant yes to Esther’s question, Juan would have said something like 'he also looked out for me'. Stating the response like this implies that the answer to Esther’s question is no.\nAnswer: no\n\nOnly output a 'yes' or 'no' as a final answer. Even if you're uncertain, choose either 'yes' or 'no'.";"Is the implied meaning of the following responses yes or no:"
"Karen: %s\nWilliam: %s\nIntent: %s";"William: ";"Intent: %s";"Karen asks William a question, and William responds with an implicature. This means that William’s response does not literally contain the answer to Karen’s question, but implies an answer. Assuming that William is a cooperative conversational partner, what is the implicated answer to the question? For example:\n\nKaren: You invented fire?\nWilliam: I told you that.\nIntent: William says 'I told you that'. William’s response must be relevant to Karen’s question because William is a cooperative conversational partner. William must mean that he told Karen that he invented fire. William’s response to Karen’s question 'You invented fire?' is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nKaren: That cake looks delicious. Aren't you going to have some with me?\nWilliam: But that was a huge meal we just had.\nIntent: William’s response must be relevant to Karen’s question because William is a cooperative conversational partner. William must mean that the meal they just had was so huge he is not hungry anymore, and this must be relevant to Karen’s question: 'Aren’t you going to have some with me?' William’s response to the question must therefore be no.\nAnswer: no\n\nKaren: Could you perform well?\nWilliam: Being bilingual would help put me ahead of the pack.\nIntent: William says being bilingual would help put him ahead of the pack. William’s response must be relevant to Karen’s question because William is a cooperative conversational partner. William must be implying that he could perform well because he is bilingual. This means the response to Karen’s question is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nKaren: Have you any news for me?\nWilliam: I've made progress\nIntent: William says he has made progress. William’s response must be relevant to Karen’s question because William is a cooperative conversational partner. If William would not have any news for Karen, William would not have said he would have made progress because that would be misleading. The answer to Karen’s question 'Have you any news for me?' must therefore be yes. \nAnswer: yes\n\nKaren: You looked out for him?\nWilliam: He looked out for me. He taught me.\nIntent: Karen asks William 'You looked out for him?' and William’s response says that the person that is being referred to by 'him' here looked out for William. If William meant yes to Karen’s question, William would have said something like 'he also looked out for me'. Stating the response like this implies that the answer to Karen’s question is no.\nAnswer: no\n\nOnly output a 'yes' or 'no' as a final answer. Even if you're uncertain, choose either 'yes' or 'no'.";"What is the intent of the following response, yes or no?"
"Karen asked "%s" and William responded "%s", which means %s";"responded ";"means %s";"Karen asks William a question, and William responds with an implicature. This means that William’s response does not literally contain the answer to Karen’s question, but implies an answer. Assuming that William is a cooperative conversational partner, what is the implicated answer to the question? For example:\n\nKaren asked ‘You invented fire?’ and William responded ‘I told you that.’, which means\nImplication: William says “I told you that”. William’s response must be relevant to Karen’s question because William is a cooperative conversational partner. William must mean that he told Karen that he invented fire. William’s response to Karen’s question “You invented fire?” is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nKaren asked ‘That cake looks delicious. Aren't you going to have some with me?’ and William responded ‘But that was a huge meal we just had.’, which means\nImplication: William’s response must be relevant to Karen’s question because William is a cooperative conversational partner. William must mean that the meal they just had was so huge he is not hungry anymore, and this must be relevant to Karen’s question: “Aren’t you going to have some with me?” William’s response to the question must therefore be no.\nAnswer: no\n\nKaren asked ‘Could you perform well?’ and William responded ‘Being bilingual would help put me ahead of the pack.’, which means\nImplication: William says being bilingual would help put him ahead of the pack. William’s response must be relevant to Karen’s question because William is a cooperative conversational partner.  William must be implying that he could perform well because he is bilingual. This means the response to Karen’s question is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nKaren asked ‘Have you any news for me?’ and William responded ‘I've made progress’, which means\nImplication: William says he has made progress. William’s response must be relevant to Karen’s question because William is a cooperative conversational partner. If William would not have any news for Karen, William would not have said he would have made progress because that would be misleading. The answer to Karen’s question “Have you any news for me?” must therefore be yes. \nAnswer: yes\n\nKaren asked ‘You looked out for him?’ and William responded ‘He looked out for me. He taught me.’, which means\nImplication: Karen asks William “You looked out for him?” and William’s response says that the person that is being referred to by “him” here looked out for William. If William meant yes to Karen’s question, William would have said something like “he also looked out for me”. Stating the response like this implies that the answer to Karen’s question is no.\nAnswer: no\n\nOnly output a 'yes' or 'no' as a final answer. Even if you're uncertain, choose either 'yes' or 'no'.";"The following are examples of the task:"
"Bob asked "%s" and Alice responded "%s", which means %s";"responded ";"means %s";"Bob asks Alice a question, and Alice responds with an implicature. This means that Alice’s response does not literally contain the answer to Bob’s question, but implies an answer. Assuming that Alice is a cooperative conversational partner, what is the implicated answer to the question? For example:\n\nBob asked ‘You invented fire?’ and Alice responded ‘I told you that.’, which means\nImplication: Alice says “I told you that”. Alice’s response must be relevant to Bob’s question because Alice is a cooperative conversational partner. Alice must mean that she told Bob that she invented fire. Alice’s response to Bob’s question “You invented fire?” is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nBob asked ‘That cake looks delicious. Aren't you going to have some with me?’ and Alice responded ‘But that was a huge meal we just had.’, which means\nImplication: Alice’s response must be relevant to Bob’s question because Alice is a cooperative conversational partner. Alice must mean that the meal they just had was so huge she is not hungry anymore, and this must be relevant to Bob’s question: “Aren’t you going to have some with me?” Alice’s response to the question must therefore be no.\nAnswer: no\n\nBob asked ‘Could you perform well?’ and Alice responded ‘Being bilingual would help put me ahead of the pack.’, which means\nImplication: Alice says being bilingual would help put her ahead of the pack. Alice’s response must be relevant to Bob’s question because Alice is a cooperative conversational partner. Alice must be implying that she could perform well because she is bilingual. This means the response to Bob’s question is yes.\nAnswer: yes\n\nBob asked ‘Have you any news for me?’ and Alice responded ‘I've made progress’, which means\nImplication: Alice says she has made progress. Alice’s response must be relevant to Bob’s question because Alice is a cooperative conversational partner. If Alice would not have any news for Bob, Alice would not have said she would have made progress because that would be misleading. The answer to Bob’s question “Have you any news for me?” must therefore be yes. \nAnswer: yes\n\nBob asked ‘You looked out for him?’ and Alice responded ‘He looked out for me. He taught me.’, which means\nImplication: Bob asks Alice “You looked out for him?” and Alice’s response says that the person that is being referred to by “him” here looked out for Alice. If Alice meant yes to Bob’s question, Alice would have said something like “he also looked out for me”. Stating the response like this implies that the answer to Bob’s question is no.\nAnswer: no\n\nOnly output a 'yes' or 'no' as a final answer. Even if you're uncertain, choose either 'yes' or 'no'.";"The following are examples of the task:"