NeurIPS 2020

Skeleton-bridged Point Completion: From Global Inference to Local Adjustment

Meta Review

The reviewers felt that this is a strong submission with an interesting idea, extensive experiments and ablations, strong results, clear writing and clear motivation. Some reviewer concerns involve missing ablation to understand the contribution of each of the losses; missing analysis of the inferred skeleton; and some reduced novelty compared to [31]. These concerns were addressed in the rebuttal. We highly encourage the authors to update their manuscript to reflect these points.