The reviewers are in consensus that there is value in this paper. We (the AC and SAC) have read and discussed the submission. We urge the authors to carefully consider the reviewers' comments, which could significantly increase the impact of the paper. In addition, the paper could be improved from a clarity perspective. Finally, we follow the reviewers in urging that some numerical examples be added, of the kind in the author response. These serve a critical function for readers in demonstrating the phenomena being studied, which makes things much more concrete for readers.