There was general consensus amongst the reviewers that this paper is well written and presents some interesting and novel ideas w.r.t. fairness in MAS. There were quite some concerns though initially w.r.t. related work, advantages and the technical aspects of the proposed approach. The rebuttal has brought a lot of clarity w.r.t all those identified issues which has lead to general agreement in the discussion of the paper that this work is worthy of publication at NeurIPS. It’s important though that the authors do take care of including the promised missing details and extended description of related work in the crc of their article.