Direction Selectivity In Primary Visual Cortex Using Massive Intracortical Connections

Part of Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7 (NIPS 1994)

Bibtex Metadata Paper

Authors

Humbert Suarez, Christof Koch, Rodney Douglas

Abstract

Almost all models of orientation and direction selectivity in visual cortex are based on feedforward connection schemes, where genicu(cid:173) late input provides all excitation to both pyramidal and inhibitory neurons. The latter neurons then suppress the response of the for(cid:173) mer for non-optimal stimuli. However, anatomical studies show that up to 90 % of the excitatory synaptic input onto any corti(cid:173) cal cell is provided by other cortical cells. The massive excitatory feedback nature of cortical circuits is embedded in the canonical microcircuit of Douglas &. Martin (1991). We here investigate ana(cid:173) lytically and through biologically realistic simulations the function(cid:173) ing of a detailed model of this circuitry, operating in a hysteretic mode. In the model, weak geniculate input is dramatically ampli(cid:173) fied by intracortical excitation, while inhibition has a dual role: (i) to prevent the early geniculate-induced excitation in the null di(cid:173) rection and (ii) to restrain excitation and ensure that the neurons fire only when the stimulus is in their receptive-field. Among the

4

Humbert Suarez, Christo! Koch, Rodney Douglas

insights gained are the possibility that hysteresis underlies visual cortical function, paralleling proposals for short-term memory, and strong limitations on linearity tests that use gratings. Properties of visual cortical neurons are compared in detail to this model and to a classical model of direction selectivity that does not include excitatory corti co-cortical connections. The model explain a num(cid:173) ber of puzzling features of direction-selective simple cells, includ(cid:173) ing the small somatic input conductance changes that have been measured experimentally during stimulation in the null direction. The model also allows us to understand why the velocity-response curve of area 17 neurons is different from that of their LG N affer(cid:173) ents, and the origin of expansive and compressive nonlinearities in the contrast-response curve of striate cortical neurons.